Oliver Crawford vs Sidharth Rawat Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing recent performance, Crawford has demonstrated a slightly superior second serve effectiveness, securing 46.42% of points, compared to Rawat's 44.97%. This marginal difference suggests a slight edge in baseline rallies for Crawford and can significantly influence match predictions.

In considering return game statistics, Rawat shows a better performance on opponent's second serve returns, winning 47.92% of those points, while Crawford secured 44.67%. However, when examining first serve return points, Crawford narrowly leads with 28.28% over Rawat’s 27.31%. This statistical insight may tilt the prediction scales in Rawat's favor when baseline play and service returns are critical.

Exploring pressure situations, Crawford has effectively handled breakpoints, saving 57.81%, whereas Rawat has saved 51.1%. Such data provides an important basis for in-game predictions, especially under high-stress scenarios.

Over a longer timeframe, Crawford holds an upper hand with a win rate of 67.65% in the past year compared to Rawat’s 54.17%. This gives an overarching view of reliability and consistency allied to outcomes in higher stakes matches.

Surface performance discloses both players thrive on hard courts, with Crawford excelling at a 71% success rate contrasted with Rawat’s 54%. This common ground propounds a well-matched clash on hard surfaces, where both exhibit their best performances.

Reviewing tournament level engagement reveals Crawford has shown dominance in lower tier tournaments, winning 80.39% of Futures/Satellites/ITF matches over the last year, while Rawat achieved a 59.09% victory rate at the same level.

The head-to-head record is closely matched, each securing a win in their two encounters. However, Crawford has won three out of the five total sets played, hinting toward better recoveries between encounters.

Previous matches lasting on average 1:36:21 implies a competitive and challenging face-off, with previous results significant for predicting outcomes in potential deciding sets. Crawford has won no decided sets against Rawat, who has a clear edge in high-pressure deciders.

Considering the player versus player tiebreak scenarios, Crawford has excelled in their sole tiebreak duel. Nonetheless, when anticipations rise in third sets, Crawford boasts a winning ratio of 67% in deciding sets across the last year, surpassing Rawat's 42%.

Analyzing break point conversion rates, Crawford has efficiently converted 34.24% of break points compared to Rawat’s 31.45%, signifying a potential edge for Crawford during crucial junctures, vital for betting strategies during live play.

Taking all these factors into account, the analytical indicators suggest Crawford has a slight favoritism to edge this competitive matchup, owing to superior handling of breakpoints, effective serve strategies, and a historically stronger performance in deciding set scenarios.